Policy —

Authoritarian regimes push for larger ITU role in DNS system

China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia want expanded ITU authority online.

Mr Mohamed Al Ghanim, Director General, Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA), UAE, speaking in meeting at Day 5, WCIT 2012
Mr Mohamed Al Ghanim, Director General, Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA), UAE, speaking in meeting at Day 5, WCIT 2012

Some of the world's most authoritarian regimes introduced a new proposal at the World Conference on International Telecommunications on Friday that could dramatically extend the jurisdiction of the International Telecommunication Union over the Internet.

In a Friday night email to Ars Technica, a spokeswoman for the American delegation portrayed the introduction of the new proposal by the United Arab Emirites partway through a key Friday negotiating session as a surprise—and an unwelcome one at that. Negotiators were irritated that they had not been furnished with copies of the proposal before it was formally introduced to the conference.

A copy of the proposal was released by the website WCITLeaks on Saturday morning. It is labeled as a proposal made by Russia, the UAE, China, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Sudan, and Egypt (though at least one Twitter user denies that Egypt supports the document).

The ITU regulations were last revised in 1988, so this will be the first time ITU rules formally apply to the Internet. The United States has been pushing to limit ITU regulations to large telecommunications incumbents like AT&T and British Telecom. In contrast, the new UAE proposal would bring a broad range of entities, including website operators like Google and Facebook, under the jurisdiction of ITU regulations.

The new proposal specifies that "member states have the right to manage all naming, numbering, addressing and identification resources used for international telecommunications/ICT services within their territories." This seems to be a challenge to the authority of ICANN and IANA, the quasi-private organizations that currently oversee the allocation of domain names and IP addresses.

The proposal would also add a new section on security issues. It specifies that the world's governments should "undertake appropriate measures" to protect the "physical and operational security of networks; denial of service attacks; countering unsolicited electronic communication (e.g Spam); and protection of information and personal data (e.g. phishing)."

The WCIT conference continues until December 14, so member countries still have several days to negotiate. During that time, the United States hopes to persuade the other nations to agree to a narrower set of rules that excludes key Internet functions from the ITU's jurisdiction.

Update: ITU spokeswoman Sarah Parkes emailed Ars Technica to clarify the ITU's role in the negotiating process:

It's important to remember that it was the ITU Member States who requested this conference - the ITU Secretariat functions only as the conference support team, helping with translation, interpretation and document management and distribution, to enable the delegates to do their work. Member States have expressed their belief that the ITRs they are currently using - which date from 1988 - are very out of date. They asked us to organize WCIT-12 so they could revise them, and they are the ones in there negotiating, not ITU.

Channel Ars Technica