How the 'derecho' storm came to be such a surprise to the mid-Atlantic

As the system moved south, forecasters started to realize this was not just an ordinary summer thunderstorm. The last time a derecho hit the US was in 2009, in the Plains states.

|
Evan Vucci/AP
Giovanny Alvarez, a letter carrier for the US Postal Service, leaves after delivering mail to a residence in Washington, D.C., Monday, July 2, damaged by the powerful storm that swept through the region Friday.

Weather forecasters first saw the small cluster of thunderstorms as they formed in northern Indiana on Friday afternoon.

As the system moved south, over the heat and humidity in central Indiana and Ohio, the forecasters started to realize this was not just an ordinary summer thunderstorm. There were reports of wind gusts topping 80 miles per hour. Radar showed the storms had formed into a bow shape and were racing along at 60 to 70 miles per hour. It had become a “derecho,” or big wind storm, which some meteorologists call a “land hurricane.”

This kind of weather event happens about once every five years, says Henry Margusity, a senior meteorologist with AccuWeather.com. The last one to hit the United States was in 2009, in the Plains states.

“These are not things where you look at a computer model and predict,” Mr. Margusity says. “It is a difficult kind of beast.”

Indeed, the question this time was: Where would the dangerous storm system go, and how long would it be a threat?

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Okla., had issued warnings for severe thunderstorms, but a computer model late on Friday afternoon predicted the system would move south into Kentucky and Tennessee.

Once the prediction center realized the system was moving to the southeast instead, forecasters thought it would lose energy once it passed over the Appalachian Mountains and air temperatures cooled in the evening. As a result, the prediction center considered the threat to the region to be a “moderate risk,” which is one level below “high risk.”

“In many situations, the mountains and the time of day will conspire to weaken storms,” says Greg Carbin, a warning coordination meteorologist at the prediction center. But, he adds, “That did not happen.”

Instead, once the storms cleared the mountains in West Virginia, they were almost as intense as they had been in Ohio. “This thing had a head of steam, and it was going to roll all the way to the Atlantic Ocean,” he says.

Hot, humid air from the Chesapeake Bay refueled the storms. Winds were gusting at close to 90 miles an hour, hurricane force by late evening. “If the wind were only 10 miles per hour less, the damage would be far less,” says Mr. Carbin.

In hindsight, Carbin, who was not working that evening, says the system should have been advertised as high risk for damaging winds. In addition, the prediction center should have termed it a “PDS” – that is, a particularly dangerous situation.

“If you knew ahead of time what was going to unfold, that would be the proper thing to do,” says Carbin.

Still, the region was in fact put on alert about dangerous thunderstorms. At 6:35 p.m., the prediction center issued a watch for the mid-Atlantic, including Washington, D.C.

“We said there was a high probability of significant wind until 1 a.m.,” Carbin says. “Anyone looking at the radar on the evening news, knowing the temperatures were very warm, would want to be concerned.”

However, he agrees that six hours is not enough warning time (the storms hit around midnight). With enough warning, meteorologists say, homeowners could grab loose items from outside and make sure they are in a sturdy building.

“You can’t outrun the storm,” says Margusity. 

The key ingredient in this storm, which Margusity terms a “super derecho,” was very hot and humid conditions on the ground. Many locations were reporting temperatures close to 100 degrees. “The fuel was just sitting there,” he says.

Combine that hot air with a large high-pressure system in the middle of the country. In the center of the high, winds were light. But on the periphery, they were moving along at a fast pace. That’s where the thunderstorms formed. As they developed, they poked higher and higher into the atmosphere until they started to drag down cooler air from the jet stream.

“Now, we have a whole line of storms working together, driving that high-velocity air down,” explains Alex Sosnowski, a senior meteorologist at AccuWeather.com.

Can it happen again?

“They don’t happen every year,” answers Julie Gaddy, a senior meteorologist at Earth Networks in Germantown, Md. “They could, but they don’t.”

Margusity thinks the storm is one of the “top three events” of the summer.

Although the event is relatively rare, it has been studied and documented before, says Ms. Gaddy, who was out videoing lightning strikes when the storm moved in. She expects the prediction center will review its information to see if it can make a better prediction next time.

“I am sure there will be many studies and research projects,” she says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How the 'derecho' storm came to be such a surprise to the mid-Atlantic
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2012/0702/How-the-derecho-storm-came-to-be-such-a-surprise-to-the-mid-Atlantic
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe