Why doesn't Stephen King pay more in taxes?

Stephen King's column at the Daily Beast, questioning why he and other well-off Americans aren't paying more in taxes, created controversy among readers.

|
Albert Ferreira/AP
'If this situation isn’t fairly addressed, last year’s protests will just be the beginning,' King writes of the Occupy protests in his column.

Prolific author Stephen King is drawing attention for his column for the Daily Beast, titled “Tax Me…,” in which he asks why he and other financially well-off members of society aren’t paying more in taxes.

King said he’d brought up the question of why he doesn’t pay more taxes at a Florida rally and received lukewarm response.

“Cut a check and shut up, they said,” King wrote in his column. “If you want to pay more, pay more, they said. Tired of hearing about it, they said… I’m not tired of talking about it.”

King said that when he and other wealthy Americans raise the question as to why they’re well-off financially but don’t pay more taxes they often get told that they should donate to organizations if they’re so determined to help with their money.

“Why don’t we get real about this?” the author wrote. “Most rich folks paying 28 percent taxes do not give out another 28 percent of their income to charity. Most rich folks like to keep their dough…. And what they do give away is – like the monies my wife and I donate – totally at their own discretion.”

The problem, says King, is that the discretionary donations that he and others make to their favorite charities won’t fix major US problems like education in or health care, among other issues that King says need to be addressed.

Every American citizen, even if his or her income is higher, needs to step up and pay, says the author.

“Those who have received much must be obligated to pay – not to give, not to ‘cut a check and shut up,’ in Governor Christie’s words, but to pay – in the same proportion,” he wrote. “That’s called stepping up and not whining about it. That’s called patriotism, a word the Tea Partiers love to throw around as long as it doesn’t cost their beloved rich folks any money.”

In his column, King pointed to the Occupy protests last year as the beginning of a backlash against the wealthy who aren’t paying as much in taxes, comparing the wealthy who reacted to the protests to Marie Antoinette (“Let them eat cake”) and Ebenezer Scrooge (“Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?”).

“Short-sighted, gentlemen,” King wrote. “Very short-sighted. If this situation isn’t fairly addressed, last year’s protests will just be the beginning. Scrooge changed his tune after the ghosts visited him. Marie Antoinette, on the other hand, lost her head.”

King’s column prompted a flurry of comments, some supportive and some critical.

“A person's money is THEIRS, if you earned it honestly,” wrote a commenter named Blackthrone. “So what you are proposing dear sir, is a actual enslavement to our government. When we give all we earn to the government in return for services we are then at the mercy of government to provide quality services. What happens when they don't?”

However, a user named RobCampbell supported King’s column.

“What a fantastic surprise – writes great books (I've read 'em all) and endeavors to right wrongs!!“ the commenter wrote.

Molly Driscoll is a Monitor contributor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why doesn't Stephen King pay more in taxes?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2012/0502/Why-doesn-t-Stephen-King-pay-more-in-taxes
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe