Supported by
Safety Agency to Investigate Ford Pickup Engine Trouble
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on Sunday that it was investigating consumer complaints about “sharp reductions” in acceleration on 2011 to 2013 Ford F-150 pickups that are equipped with the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 engine.
The action, called a preliminary evaluation, covers about 400,000 of the F-150 pickups, the safety agency said. A Ford spokesman, Michael Levine, wrote in an e-mail that although the number of vehicles affected was likely to be more than 325,000, the agency’s figure was too high.
The F-150 is one of the automaker’s most popular, lucrative and thus important vehicles. And the twin-turbocharged EcoBoost V-6 is one of Ford’s main engines, used to power not just the F-150 but also sport utility vehicles like the Explorer, crossovers like the Flex and cars like the Taurus.
A Ford spokeswoman, Kelli Felker, wrote in an e-mail that the company was aware of the investigation and would cooperate with the safety agency.
The safety agency decided to investigate after receiving 95 complaints from F-150 owners saying they had experienced unexpected power loss during hard accelerations. About a third of those complaints said the problem had occurred in damp or rainy conditions. There were no reports of accidents.
“Attempting to pass a vehicle accelerating from 55 miles per hour and truck either stutters or stalls,” one owner wrote to the agency in February 2012. “This almost caused a head-on collision. I am scared to pull out in traffic or pass anyone.”
The safety agency said Ford had sent three technical service bulletins to dealers telling them how to cope with “intermittent/stumble misfire on acceleration” in humid or damp conditions.
The EcoBoost is a family of engines in various sizes. Ford has widely promoted the EcoBoost’s turbocharging and direct-injection technology as providing excellent power as well as fuel economy.
The investigation covers only the 3.5 liter V-6, which made its debut in the F-150 for the 2011 model year. In 2012, about 43 percent of the F-150s were equipped with the optional 3.5 liter engine, Mr. Levine wrote in an e-mail.
If investigators find additional reason for concern during the preliminary evaluation, it would be upgraded to an engineering analysis.
A preliminary evaluation does not typically result in a recall. That outcome is more likely, but not certain, after an engineering analysis.
Recalls happen most quickly when automakers are convinced there is a safety problem. It has sometimes taken the agency a year to complete a preliminary evaluation and another year for an engineering analysis.
Last July Ford recalled about 11,500 of its 2013 Escape crossovers because of a fire hazard with its 1.6-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder engine.
Explore Our Business Coverage
Dive deeper into the people, issues and trends shaping the world of business.
Landline Pride: Traditional phones may seem like relics in the iPhone era, but a recent AT&T cellular service outage had some landline lovers extolling their virtues.
C.E.O. Dreams: Fresh business school graduates are raising “search funds” from willing investors to buy companies they can lead.
Nelson Peltz Wants Respect: The longtime corporate agitator feels misunderstood. Maybe his fight with Disney could change that.
The Palm Oil Supply Chain: An E.U. ban on imports linked to deforestation has been hailed as a “gold standard” in climate policy. Southeast Asian countries say it threatens livelihoods.
Tough Times Ahead: As the prices for office space in urban centers tumble, cities whose municipal budgets rely on taxes associated with commercial real estate are starting to bear the brunt.
Going Solo: In Taiwan, the government is racing to do what no country or even company has been able to: build an alternative to Starlink, the satellite internet service operated by Elon Musk’s rocket company, SpaceX.
Advertisement